Universal Audio Dream '65 Reverb Amp Pedal Review
Verdict and Review Summary
Digital emulation pedals have gotten increasingly better at replicating analog tones, and the Dream '65 is no exception. Though its value is in consolidation, giving you amp, cab, and footswitch controls all in one box with plenty of flexibility. Folks trying to consolidate a physical tube amp rig and cab setup will get the most value.
The Dream ’65 Reverb Amp Pedal comes as part of Universal Audio's new lineup of amp emulation and effects pedals.
Modeled after arguably the classic American guitar amplifier, this pedal does a great job of replicating the unmistakable tone of the Fender ’65 Deluxe Reverb combo amp.
Spring reverb, vibrato, tremolo, overdrive – they’re all here, and excellently reproduced. Yet this pedal goes above and beyond, offering an a range of tones, with cab emulations, mic emulators, and amp mods.
In this review, we’ll give our first-hand take on this highly versatile pedal.
Please note that all of the content on Guitar Chalk is opinion, complete lunacy, and probably wrong. As such, take what we have to say with a grain of salt, especially if you decide to hit up the comments section.
Compare to Similar Preamp Pedals
In this section we've added a couple similar electric guitar preamps for comparing to the Dream '65.
Use the compare buttons for more details and consider using our Sweetwater links if you do decide to buy gear. These links help support our site at no extra cost to you.
Thanks for reading and trusting us.
Universal Audio Dream '65
Walrus Audio ACS1 Preamp Pedal
We also have additional pricing info and tools in the tables below.
Price on Sweetwater
Price Alert Tool
IDEAL FOR: Consolidating rigs into a smaller footprint, recording, adding flexibility
Overall Tone Quality
The Dream ’65 offers a rich variety of tones, flawlessly emulating the classic sparkling cleans of the original Fender Deluxe amplifier. And, like the original, adjustments to the volume input level (preamp) produce dynamic results, especially as the pedal eases into overdrive and subtle breakup.
While all of this is modeled digitally (based on an algorithm), the technology has come so far that it’s difficult to distinguish this pedal from the original amp, especially on a recording.
We always recommend Bonedo's non-talking audio demos.
Distortion and Gain
The Dream ‘65’s mod settings allow for some dynamic and powerful overdrive sounds, both for leads and rhythm. The three available mods are:
I’ll cover some detail about each one.
The classic 65’ Reverb Deluxe amp tone. Use the Boost knob to add up to 10db of clean gain, great for clean tones that are brighter and more defined. This is also ideal for high register pick attack and general emphasis on right-hand movement.
The name is a bit deceptive as this mod actually removes the bright cap, giving a warmer, ‘80s style sound when the Boost is low. Adding Boost gives more midrange for a great ‘lead boost’ which is where the lead-style lean of this mod comes into play.
This ‘SRV’ mod is great for that Texas-style blues sound, replicating SRV-style soft compression when the Boost is low. This mod offers a lot more gain and a nice open midrange when you crank up the Boost.
Reverb and Ambience
The inbuilt spring reverb is a fantastic recreation of the classic ’65 Deluxe reverb sound, and uses the same spring reverb tank as Universal Audio’s Golden Reverb pedal. Using this sound in combination with the pedal’s various mods gives you a lot of flexibility and room to maneuver.
What’s more, the various speaker cabinet and microphone emulators can provide even more space to experiment, which is – of course – something you can’t do as easily with a physical amplifier.
I find that speakers and microphone emulations tend to be generally less satisfying, and more difficult to emulate digitally.
It’s fair to say that’s true in the Dream ’65.
They give you the ability to further customize your tone, but the differences are fairly subtle. Plus you have the added factor of possibly using actual speaker cabs and microphones, that already have a sound all their own. I found that for the most part, I left the speaker emulation on Oxford.
Nevertheless, the three inbuilt speaker cabinet emulators are:
- OXFORD: A replication of the Oxford 12K5-6 speaker that is built into the original amp, aiming for a vintage 1960s tone.
- GB25: The sound of the Vintage Celestion Greenback speaker with ribbon mic emulation, which gives off a smooth open midrange
- EV12: This 12”, 200-watt Electro-Voice EVM12L cabinet creates a thick, tight bottom end, while keeping the top airy and crisp.
When you register your pedal with Universal Audio, you get three additional speaker cab options:
- Two-Rock 2x12 extension cab with Celestion G12-65s, with ribbon and 57 mic emulation, which mimics a California ported cab sound.
- 1966 4x10 Fender Super Reverb cab with original CTS speakers, which give you that vintage surf-rock Alnico vibe.
- A Vintage 1968 2x12 Fender Twin Reverb cab with original JBL D-120F speakers, creating a really detailed sound that’s great for finger picking and is extremely responsive to gain-level adjustments.
If you’re using the pedal with a ‘real’ external amp or cabinet, you might have to do some tinkering to make sure you don’t just overrun your amp’s natural tone.
Testing the Dream ’65 I used a Mesa Rectoverb, and left the reverb entirely off most of the time. I made EQ tweaks from the pedal, and left the Mesa EQ at a softened setting with higher bass and mids/treble set at 12 o’clock. It’s a bit disappointing that the Dream ’65 doesn’t have a balanced output like an XLR connection, which would make it easy to effectively use the ’65 as your only amplification source.
But it’s certainly not a problem to use your amp and just set let the Dream ’65 do the heavy lifting. Another alternative is to use a DI box. The stereo output would also allow you to do both (one side to an external amp and one to a DI box).
Control and Versatility
As I’ve mentioned, this is a highly flexible and versatile pedal, with enough tones and options for just about any guitarist out there. And as I’ve already mentioned, mods and cabinet ambiences with a real amp would require replacing speakers and microphones. In the Dream ’65, this be achieved at the flick of a button.
You certainly have some limitations when emulating these external elements, but the Dream ’65 comes close, even if you ignore the cost savings and benefits of consolidating all the gear required to setup an amp, cab, and microphone.
The number of controls is pretty straightforward, with six knobs and two footswitches allowing you to access everything the pedal can do. This keeps the pedal intuitive and easy to use after initial orientation. Dual engine processing allows you to craft your own custom setups, and you can store your own presets at the touch of a button. As if that wasn’t enough you can connect the pedal to the UAFX app via Bluetooth, which allows you to manage even more presets, and re-configure the control scheme.
Note that when testing the pedal we did not experiment with the Bluetooth connection or make any attempt to reconfigure the controls.
As I alluded to earlier, it also offers various signal routing options: Mono-in, stereo-in, or mono-in and stereo-out, and the input and output can accept both line and mic levels, meaning the pedal can be used not only with guitars but as an outboard studio effect too.
How it Compares to Cheaper Preamp Pedals
If you’re looking to spend less and are after a thicker, modern gain sound, there are a couple options that are cheaper than the Dream ’65, like the Revv G4 and the Xotic BB. Both of these preamps offer a decent range of distortion and clean tones, but they don’t have the same versatility or clean tone options as the Dream ’65.
They also don’t really specialize in a particular type of amplifier like the Dream ’65.
Though if you want to spend less than $400 retail, they’re certainly worth looking into.
Overall Value (price)
Obviously one of the main things to consider when evaluating the value of an amp emulation pedal is:
Does it do justice to the original amp on which it is modeled?
As I mentioned, the technology is so strong that the tones of the pedal and the original amp are decently close to one another.
But another, perhaps more important, feature of the Dream ’65 is that it consolidates so much functionality into one spot. Footswitch controls, presets, preamp, vintage effects, amp controls, and cabinets are all sort of smashed into one pedal. And while you do sacrifice some “purity” of a full setup, you gain a lot of flexibility at a far lower price tag, if you’re comparing to what it would cost you for a physical amp, footswitch, and speaker cab.
You're talking thousands of dollars compared to $400.
To that end, is it worth the investment?
We'd argue yes, in most cases.
When you consider this pedal costs $399 and a Fender ‘65 Deluxe Reverb amp today costs around $1600, you’re seeing great value for what you pay.
Ideal Fit and Context
The Dream ’65 Reverb amp pedal is arguably even more versatile than the classic amplifier that it emulates. If your priority is flexibility and consolidation, the Dream ’65 is going to get the job done and could potentially be a major rig upgrade if you’re running a cheaper amp.
From a style perspective, it's suitable for playing classic rock, blues, country, and jazz, same as the original '65 combo.
Fans of more modern tones and heavier gain styles should probably look elsewhere, or add a complimentary distortion source.
This is definitely one of the most powerful preamp pedals we’ve tested, which succeeds not only in replicating the classic amp on which it’s based, but offers a huge range of versatile options for just about any style.
If you have questions about the Universal Audio Dream ’65, or you have a perspective on the pedal you’d like to share, drop it in the comments section below.
Written by GC Editorial on Pedals and Comparisons
Comment Policy: You're down to leave a comment? That's awesome. Keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. Please avoid any spammy keywords or a domain as your name, otherwise your comment will be deleted. Let's stay on topic, keep questions relevant and have a meaningful conversation. All the best.