The Behringer Wing VS the X32: What are the differences?
Channels (depending on versions), size of display, customization, and DAW integration.
There are a lot of technical weeds to get into here, which you can get via the user manuals. I'd rather focus on the practical differences, which include channel/bus count, a larger display in the WING, more customization in the WING, and better DAW integration in the X32. Price will definitely play a role here, as the X32 is significantly cheaper, but we think the WING is well worth the steeper investment.
| Feature/Specification | Behringer WING | Behringer X32 |
|---|---|---|
| Input/Output Characteristics | ||
| Frequency Response | 10 Hz - 20 kHz | Not Specified |
| Dynamic Range (Analog In to Out) | 111 dB (XLR) / 108 dB (Aux) | Not Specified |
| A/D Dynamic Range | 112 dB (XLR) / 110 dB (Aux) | Not Specified |
| D/A Dynamic Range | 118 dB (XLR) / 112 dB (Aux) | Not Specified |
| Crosstalk Rejection | 100 dB @ 1 kHz | Not Specified |
| Maximum Output Level | +21 dBu (XLR) | Not Specified |
| Output Impedance | 75 Ω (XLR) | Not Specified |
| Input Impedance (TRS) | 20 kΩ (Unbalanced) / 40 kΩ (Balanced) | Not Specified |
| Maximum Input Level (TRS) | +16 dBu | Not Specified |
| Aux Output Level (TRS) | +4 dBu / +16 dBu | Not Specified |
| Phones Output | 500 mW @ 75 Ω / +18 dBu | Not Specified |
| Residual Noise Level | -97 dBu (XLR Out) / -95 dBu (Aux and Monitor) | Not Specified |
| Displays | ||
| Main Screen | 10.1" TFT LCD, 1280 x 800 px, capacitive touch | 7" Color TFT |
| Channel Editing Screen | 2.4" TFT LCD, 320 x 240 px | LCD with RGB Color Backlight (channel) |
| Main Stereo Meter | 18 segment (-60 dB to clip) | Not Specified |
| Controls | ||
| Motor Faders | 24 total (12 + 8 + 4) | 25 x 100mm (motorized) |
| Touch-sensitive Rotary Controls | 29 total | Not Specified |
| Custom Controls | 4 rotary controls, 16 backlit buttons | Not Specified |
| Power | ||
| Power Consumption | 130 W | Standard IEC AC cable |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 201 x 870 x 575 mm (7.9 x 34.3 x 22.6") | 7.9" x 35.4" x 20.8" |
| Weight | 24 kg (52.8 lbs) | 45.4 lbs (20.6 kg) |
| Additional Features | ||
| Channels | 48 input channels, 28 bus mixes | 40 input channels, 25 total buses |
| Mic Preamps | Not Specified | 32 x gain-programmable Midas-designed |
| USB Connectivity | Not Specified | 2 x Type B, 1 x Type A |
| Computer Connectivity | Not Specified | USB |
| Effects Rack | Yes | Yes |
| Software Integration | WING Co-Pilot app | X32-Edit app |
| Unique Features | Source-focused mixing, adjustable armrest | DAW compatibility, P16-M Personal Monitoring System compatibility |
While both mixers are a good value, the WING is the nicer of the two and certainly more customizable with a more spacious panel and interface. Image via Milton Koprosky
To account for the lower price, you get less flexibility and the panel just feels cheaper, which it is. But overall, the X32 is still an excellent value and a popular, cost-effective option for smaller studio/performance scenarios. Image via Isaac Moreno
5 Differences Between the WING and X32
- Display and Control: The WING has a larger main display and more touch-sensitive rotary controls. It also has a dedicated channel editing screen.
- Channel and Bus Counts: The WING supports more input channels and bus mixes.
- Mic Preamps: The X32 features Midas-designed preamps while the WING has Midas PRO preamps. However, the preamp type doesn't matter nearly as much when you're talking about digital mixers.
- Physical Dimensions and Weight: The WING is slightly heavier and larger than the X32.
- Unique Features: The WING emphasizes customizable controls and its source-first approach, while the X32 focuses on DAW integration and a low learning curve.
The WING or X32? What's the better value?
While both mixers can be used in a professional recording or performing capacity, the WING is the more "polished" of the two, for lack of a better word. It's more flexible and closer to what could be considered a mid-grade, pro-level mixing board, while the X32 isn't quite at the same level.
For smaller bands or perhaps home recording studios, the X32 will do the job (and probably more). But for larger groups, churches, and recording studios that serve a clientele, the WING might be the better investment.
As always, make sure you've put in the time to research things for yourself and figure out what makes the most sense for your situation.
If you want to share your thoughts or ask questions, use the comments section below. We'll help out as much as possible.
Behringer WING and X32 Price Comparison
Prices updated Fri, August 21st, 2026.
Related Pro Audio Articles
Written by Gear Consultants on Mixers & Comparisons
Written by Bobby Kittleberger on Mixers & Roundups
Editorial Contributions and Team
We link to products on Sweetwater that help support our site and keep the lights on. If you click through our orange buttons, we might earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you all for your generous support over the years! ~ Bobby and Danielle
Our disclosure↬
the newsletter
Gear and guitar lesson reviews by real guitar players
We buy, use, test, research, and rate the guitar programs and gear we recommend. Sign up for our mailing list and we'll keep you up to date.
By clicking the "sign up" button, you are consenting to receiving updates about Guitar Chalk and recaps of what we publish. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Comment Policy: You're down to leave a comment? That's awesome. Keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. Please avoid any spammy keywords or a domain as your name, otherwise your comment will be deleted. Let's stay on topic, keep questions relevant and have a meaningful conversation. All the best.